HGH vs Peptides

[trumped21]

Hey Everyone - I've been surfing through the endless amounts of info on the net. I am still a bit confused about the differences and advantages/disadvantages of HGH vs the plethora of peptides out there. What do you guys think? Thanks in advance

 

[flexmaster85]

Personally, I think Peps are a fine choice and can be very effective. Less costly than GH, and don't shut down your natty GH production.

 

[strengthfreak]

Peptides help you release your own natural GH

 

[trumped21]

Does this apply if you are my age - over 38? I have heard that your natural GH is pretty much gone by this point and that true GH is more effective. Is there any truth in this?

 

[strengthfreak]

Does this apply if you are my age - over 38? I have heard that your natural GH is pretty much gone by this point and that true GH is more effective. Is there any truth in this?

Our natural GH levels decline as we age but it doesn't mean they're totally gone. Peptides like GHRP-6 or Ipamorelin can give your body that extra push to crank out more GH naturally.

 

[Tuan]

Hello everyone I’m new to this forum and have a question has anyone used peptides and sarms together if have can you please share info on good and bad and which ones you used thanks

 

[doc]

Hey Everyone - I've been surfing through the endless amounts of info on the net. I am still a bit confused about the differences and advantages/disadvantages of HGH vs the plethora of peptides out there. What do you guys think? Thanks in advance

Peptides do similar things to a low dose GH. In my experience they can shut down your natural system but potentially to a lesser extent ( also because they are not as effective as you increase dose)
Peptides worked great in my 40’s especially for fat loss but results are much lower in 50’s which I attribute to natural system not working as well. I imagine real GH would work better in this case
Definitely worth a try as it’s cost effective, potentially safer and everyone’s response will vary- you might be lucky.

 

[doc]

Does this apply if you are my age - over 38? I have heard that your natural GH is pretty much gone by this point and that true GH is more effective. Is there any truth in this?

You should have a good 10 years if natural system’s ok. I noticed change in 50’s after years of stress, injury and inability to do resistance training for 8 years. Natural test and GH levels were almost low enough for medical professionals and peptides seem to give a lot less bang for buck

 

[doc]

Hello everyone I’m new to this forum and have a question has anyone used peptides and sarms together if have can you please share info on good and bad and which ones you used thanks

Yes - did lots of experiments since 90’s .
Long story but I prefer to separate them. Cjc and ghrp still give me best results. Nowadays there’s To many combinations to comment on. SARMS are convenient but expensive and some will effect your natural system ( test, GH, insulin, estrogen, prolactin can all change depending on what you’re stacking with- which complicates managing side effects) Anything that works will effect other hormones so I prefer to use something that definitely works and stack less ( it’s also much cheaper )

 

[hubbles]

Hello everyone I’m new to this forum and have a question has anyone used peptides and sarms together if have can you please share info on good and bad and which ones you used thanks

Hey brother, from what I know the best SARMs for hardening is S4 (andarine). Osta/S4 combo is perfect for hardening up and sparing muscle.

As far as peptides go...they won't transform your body the way anabolics do but they will aid in fat loss. The closest thing you can get to actual HGH is a combo of either GHRP-6 or 2...or Ipamorelin in conjunction with CJC-1295. This will have your body pumping it's own natural GH in overdrive and spiking your IGF-1 levels through the roof. Great for fat loss.

 

[Guy Inc]

I just tried HGH for the first time and was surprised that I didn't 'feel' anything from it. With the releasing peptides I usually had low blood sugar but 3 IUs of GH felt like nothing.
Is this normal? I'm thinking either the GH is no good or the blood sugar crashes I feel from the peptides isn't an immune reaction and not the actual released GH.

 

[darkHORSE]

I just tried HGH for the first time and was surprised that I didn't 'feel' anything from it. With the releasing peptides I usually had low blood sugar but 3 IUs of GH felt like nothing.
Is this normal? I'm thinking either the GH is no good or the blood sugar crashes I feel from the peptides isn't an immune reaction and not the actual released GH.

How long and what was your dose with GH, also did you stack it with anything else?

 

[Guy Inc]

How long and what was your dose with GH, also did you stack it with anything else?

3 IUs. I'm taking other stuff but administered at a different time of day.
With the peptides I think the dose was 250mcg of both Ipamorelin and GHRP-2

 

[darkHORSE]

3 IUs. I'm taking other stuff but administered at a different time of day.
With the peptides I think the dose was 250mcg of both Ipamorelin and GHRP-2

Very common not to "feel" much with 3 IUs especially if you're just starting. GH tends to have more subtle long-term benefits like improved skin elasticity, muscle recovery and fat loss over months rather than immediate sensations. The blood sugar drops from peptides are due to their stimulating effects on GH release not necessarily the GH itself. Give it some time and results become more noticeable with regular use and proper diet and training.

 

[hubbles]

Very common not to "feel" much with 3 IUs especially if you're just starting. GH tends to have more subtle long-term benefits like improved skin elasticity, muscle recovery and fat loss over months rather than immediate sensations. The blood sugar drops from peptides are due to their stimulating effects on GH release not necessarily the GH itself. Give it some time and results become more noticeable with regular use and proper diet and training.