T teamnatty Registered Jun 20, 2025 #1 How do the gains to side effect ratios of peptides, MK677, GH, and Insulin compare to Anabolics?
chesster Registered Jun 20, 2025 #2 What's the go with your posts ? You trying to create backlinks or promote something?
LF*GO Registered Jun 20, 2025 #3 teamnatty said: How do the gains to side effect ratios of peptides, MK677, GH, and Insulin compare to Anabolics? Click to expand... Gear gives the best gains, but more sides. Peptides, MK677 and GH are safer but way slower. Insulin can blow you up but it’s risky. Nothing beats anabolics for size
teamnatty said: How do the gains to side effect ratios of peptides, MK677, GH, and Insulin compare to Anabolics? Click to expand... Gear gives the best gains, but more sides. Peptides, MK677 and GH are safer but way slower. Insulin can blow you up but it’s risky. Nothing beats anabolics for size
crackers Registered Jul 1, 2025 #4 Peptides, MK677 and GH are more about slow comp changes and recovery with low sides if used properly. Insulin’s powerful but dangerous. Anabolics hit hardest for size and strength, but sides are heavier. Just depends how much risk you’re chasing.
Peptides, MK677 and GH are more about slow comp changes and recovery with low sides if used properly. Insulin’s powerful but dangerous. Anabolics hit hardest for size and strength, but sides are heavier. Just depends how much risk you’re chasing.